<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Times claims to expose corrupting Experian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idealgovernment.com/2009/01/sunday_times_claims_to_expose_corrupting_experian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2009/01/sunday_times_claims_to_expose_corrupting_experian/</link>
	<description>What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard S</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2009/01/sunday_times_claims_to_expose_corrupting_experian/comment-page-1/#comment-2733</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunday_times_claims_to_expose_corrupting_experian#comment-2733</guid>
		<description>We badly need &quot;Lord Ideal of Government.&quot;

I&#039;m against journalist entrapment and concerned about how easy it is to produce misleading results by editing video or audio.

But, I was astonished at the apparent belief that just because something is not specifically illegal, it is therefore completely acceptable.

To me, this yet again displays the failure of &quot;statute law&quot; compared with Britain&#039;s long established system of &quot;common law&quot;: Common law can evolve and adapt to society&#039;s needs whereas Statute laws are too often just a gravy-train for lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We badly need &#8220;Lord Ideal of Government.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m against journalist entrapment and concerned about how easy it is to produce misleading results by editing video or audio.</p>
<p>But, I was astonished at the apparent belief that just because something is not specifically illegal, it is therefore completely acceptable.</p>
<p>To me, this yet again displays the failure of &#8220;statute law&#8221; compared with Britain&#8217;s long established system of &#8220;common law&#8221;: Common law can evolve and adapt to society&#8217;s needs whereas Statute laws are too often just a gravy-train for lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

