<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles Clarke doesn&#8217;t seem to get it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idealgovernment.com/2008/09/charles_clarke_doesnt_seem_to_get_it1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2008/09/charles_clarke_doesnt_seem_to_get_it1/</link>
	<description>What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukliberty</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2008/09/charles_clarke_doesnt_seem_to_get_it1/comment-page-1/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>ukliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charles_clarke_doesnt_seem_to_get_it1#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the NAO ever get bored with writing the same old thing.

What are the common causes of government IT project failure?

   1. Lack of clear link between the project and the organisation’s key strategic priorities, including agreed measures of success.
   2. Lack of clear senior management and Ministerial ownership and leadership.
   3. Lack of effective engagement with stakeholders.
   4. Lack of skills and proven approach to project management and risk management.
   5. Lack of understanding of and contact with the supply industry at senior levels in the organisation.
   6. Evaluation of proposals driven by initial price rather than long term value for money (especially securing delivery of business benefits).
   7. Too little attention to breaking development and implementation into manageable steps.
   8. Inadequate resources and skills to deliver the total portfolio.

Wibbi Charles Clarke had remained in the private sector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the NAO ever get bored with writing the same old thing.</p>
<p>What are the common causes of government IT project failure?</p>
<p>   1. Lack of clear link between the project and the organisation’s key strategic priorities, including agreed measures of success.<br />
   2. Lack of clear senior management and Ministerial ownership and leadership.<br />
   3. Lack of effective engagement with stakeholders.<br />
   4. Lack of skills and proven approach to project management and risk management.<br />
   5. Lack of understanding of and contact with the supply industry at senior levels in the organisation.<br />
   6. Evaluation of proposals driven by initial price rather than long term value for money (especially securing delivery of business benefits).<br />
   7. Too little attention to breaking development and implementation into manageable steps.<br />
   8. Inadequate resources and skills to deliver the total portfolio.</p>
<p>Wibbi Charles Clarke had remained in the private sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

