<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nitwit learns the seriousness of data nitwittery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idealgovernment.com/2008/01/nitwit_learns_the_seriousness_of_data_nitwittery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2008/01/nitwit_learns_the_seriousness_of_data_nitwittery/</link>
	<description>What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideal Gov administrator</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2008/01/nitwit_learns_the_seriousness_of_data_nitwittery/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideal Gov administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nitwit_learns_the_seriousness_of_data_nitwittery#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>Very good point Paul, and very good challenge/suggestion. I think we can muster the odd advocate, and we can always ask the IPS press office to help out :-)

Do you have experience of using the debatemapper? It looks intriguing, but I can sometimes be seduced by the superficial appeal of an attractive-looking tool. Does it need a good debate-mapper-moderator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point Paul, and very good challenge/suggestion. I think we can muster the odd advocate, and we can always ask the IPS press office to help out <img src='http://idealgovernment.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Do you have experience of using the debatemapper? It looks intriguing, but I can sometimes be seduced by the superficial appeal of an attractive-looking tool. Does it need a good debate-mapper-moderator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Johnston</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2008/01/nitwit_learns_the_seriousness_of_data_nitwittery/comment-page-1/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nitwit_learns_the_seriousness_of_data_nitwittery#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>William

I am a bit frightened to share this piece of personal data about me, but despite being a regular reader of this site, I still see myself as an ignoramus in relation to the ID cards debate. What would be useful to me would be a clear presentation of the pros and cons. Would it make sense to try to get all sides of the debate to collaboratively map their argument on a tool such as https://debatemapper.com/sf/home.aspx? What do you think? And who might one be able to rope in to provide a good taste of the arguments in favour?

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William</p>
<p>I am a bit frightened to share this piece of personal data about me, but despite being a regular reader of this site, I still see myself as an ignoramus in relation to the ID cards debate. What would be useful to me would be a clear presentation of the pros and cons. Would it make sense to try to get all sides of the debate to collaboratively map their argument on a tool such as <a href="https://debatemapper.com/sf/home.aspx" rel="nofollow">https://debatemapper.com/sf/home.aspx</a>? What do you think? And who might one be able to rope in to provide a good taste of the arguments in favour?</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

