WRITTEN ON January 7th, 2008 BY William Heath AND STORED IN Transformational Government, What do we want?

Government still doesn’t have a very smart IT strategy despite the best efforts for over three years of Ideal Government. And government still isn’t particularly good, despite the best efforts of something called the Better government initiative which seems to have been going on for about as long (I just first heard of it in in this Whittam-Smith comment piece)

“Better gov initiative” is different from Ideal Gov. It has done a series of considered white-papery reports with top-level recommendations (many in the passive tense), while we’re done thousands of folksonomic articles with thousands of comments, some spam, some fatuous, some deeply thought-provoking. BGI is chocabloc with names of senior chaps who have been in the big jobs and mostly got titles and retired. It’s not big on pertinent art or humour. I guess they’re ex-insiders who know how to play the game and hang out at cool-sounding places like Ditchley.

It’s quite interesting to hear of such a group pooling their concern and putting some effort to thinking about how things might be better. I wonder what sort of energy they have, whether they’re fired up about the possibilities of the contempory net and understand the potential of service design in government reform? I guess they’re at the opposite end of a scale of serious reformers to someone like John Thakara.

Better go and meet them I suppose. Thank heavens I still have a fab PA. If/when they were still in their day jobs they’d have insulated themselves from potentially disruptive influences indefinitely. But now they’re trying to find a way of doing the right thing and looking or bright ideas perhaps we can met with open minds on both sides. I strongly suspect there will be quite a cultural difference. But that’s good. We can learn a great deal from each other. I’m ready to listen, and I’m ready to express our insights in a constructive way.

Here goes…

9 Responses to “Hello hello hello: what’s this “Better government initiative” then?”

 
alex wrote on January 7th, 2008 4:26 pm :

William

Happy New Year

Looking at the BGI list, I would say they are yesterday’s men.

WIBBI you made contact with Vince Cable – he seems to be the one able to score points and is today’s man.

Ideal Gov administrator wrote on January 7th, 2008 4:51 pm :

Nice thought. Hoping to meet Nick Cleg – will that do? Or is there something about Vince (conscius of his bons mots and general performance as actin leader) which means I should contact him separately? (do reply off-blog if it’s sensitive, or here if it’s of general interest) W

Ian Brown wrote on January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm :

Hopefully some of the SeniorRetiredTitledChaps might like to come along to our Gov 2.0 event for some bright ideas…
http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/events/details.cfm?id=169

Public Strategist wrote on January 7th, 2008 8:05 pm :

I was going to add to your semiotic analysis by oberving that you don’t have to do more than look at the picture at the top of the BGI site to get a sense of what they think government is and what would make it better.

But then I had to look at the IG site itelf, rather than just reading the feed, to be faced with a reminder of your own, infinitely more distinctive and distinguished image.

So that’s a comment better not made…:)

Ruth Kennedy wrote on January 8th, 2008 12:07 am :

Hmmm, the list of participants does read a little like a Yes Minister script (‘don’t you think, Sir Wally?’). Would it be rude to point out that they, of all people, ought to know that there is only one Chatham House rule?

Ruth Kennedy wrote on January 8th, 2008 12:14 am :

oooh – that weird slightly scary winking smiley happens if you inadvertently use a question mark, followed by a single inverted comma, followed by a closing bracket. Totally unintentional!

Ideal Gov administrator wrote on January 8th, 2008 12:56 am :

?’)

Just testing ;-) —–

Paul Atreides wrote on January 9th, 2008 12:02 am :

It’s passive voice, not tense.

Ideal Gov administrator wrote on January 9th, 2008 4:01 am :

Ooh yes, I guess it is.

Look, my dear IdealGov community, do you think between us any of us can manage to read one of their reports and make substantive comments on it? We dont want to look like lightweights here.

Leave a Reply