Comments on: ORG observes e-voting: the evidence does not look good http://idealgovernment.com/2007/06/org_observes_e_voting_the_evidence_does_not_look_good/ What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn't it be better if... Wed, 14 May 2014 08:35:11 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ideal Gov administrator http://idealgovernment.com/2007/06/org_observes_e_voting_the_evidence_does_not_look_good/comment-page-1/#comment-1701 Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:22:01 +0000 http://org_observes_e_voting_the_evidence_does_not_look_good#comment-1701 Man, and there’s me on the Board. Cheers. As ORG points out, human error is always something to watch for in online systems 🙂

]]>
By: ukliberty http://idealgovernment.com/2007/06/org_observes_e_voting_the_evidence_does_not_look_good/comment-page-1/#comment-1700 Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:19:32 +0000 http://org_observes_e_voting_the_evidence_does_not_look_good#comment-1700 Hi, I believe the URL is incorrect.

It should read, http://www.openrights.org, not http://www.openrights.org.uk.

]]>
By: Richard S http://idealgovernment.com/2007/06/org_observes_e_voting_the_evidence_does_not_look_good/comment-page-1/#comment-1699 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:59:32 +0000 http://org_observes_e_voting_the_evidence_does_not_look_good#comment-1699 No “conspiracy,” just poor choice & “old news”: Look at the URL of the image: It’s probably one that a junior reporter dredged from the picture library:

“blaircountPA050505_228x374.jpg” sounds like a Press Association photo of the count for Blair’s Sedgefield constituency on 5th May 2005.

One of the filing trays is also marked “Blair.”

]]>