<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Me, Tom and the Kam-Fuk non-declaration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idealgovernment.com/2007/04/me_tom_and_the_kam_fuk_non_declaration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2007/04/me_tom_and_the_kam_fuk_non_declaration/</link>
	<description>What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:36:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Birch</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2007/04/me_tom_and_the_kam_fuk_non_declaration/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Birch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">me_tom_and_the_kam_fuk_non_declaration#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tom takes a view there’s little point in writing things that will be toned down or edited out, or in making recommendations that cost money and would get thrown out by HM Treasury.&quot;

Isn&#039;t this, essentially, a counsel of dispair?  Perhaps the only viable route to any improvement is to steadily remove more and more functionality from the government.  To pick an example well-known to both us, is there any evidence that any of the consultation or comment around the ID card has changed the government&#039;s perspective at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tom takes a view there’s little point in writing things that will be toned down or edited out, or in making recommendations that cost money and would get thrown out by HM Treasury.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this, essentially, a counsel of dispair?  Perhaps the only viable route to any improvement is to steadily remove more and more functionality from the government.  To pick an example well-known to both us, is there any evidence that any of the consultation or comment around the ID card has changed the government&#8217;s perspective at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
