<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Survey on Electronic ID in Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idealgovernment.com/2006/07/online_survey_on_electronic_id_in_europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2006/07/online_survey_on_electronic_id_in_europe/</link>
	<description>What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:36:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard S</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2006/07/online_survey_on_electronic_id_in_europe/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">online_survey_on_electronic_id_in_europe#comment-923</guid>
		<description>IMHO, questions about &quot;age,&quot; &quot;gender,&quot; &quot;marital status,&quot; &quot;employment status,&quot; etc. etc. should always be optional.

Otherwise, don&#039;t expect an accurate answer!

I also note that their questions have not kept up with current laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, questions about &#8220;age,&#8221; &#8220;gender,&#8221; &#8220;marital status,&#8221; &#8220;employment status,&#8221; etc. etc. should always be optional.</p>
<p>Otherwise, don&#8217;t expect an accurate answer!</p>
<p>I also note that their questions have not kept up with current laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2006/07/online_survey_on_electronic_id_in_europe/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 14:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">online_survey_on_electronic_id_in_europe#comment-922</guid>
		<description>hmm. I actually didn&#039;t find this intrusive at all. And I thought their questions were really pertinent and provocative, in getting me to think through how I really feel about the user requirement for a national ID card scheme. What sort of increased convenience and speed would make an ID card worthwhile, in return for handing over personal ID? 

My answers reflected, I think, a deep mistrust I have over (certainly the UK) government&#039;s ability to handle personal data accurately, securely and with integrity (and preferably to apologise when they get things wrong - unlike the recent CRB debacle...). I wonder whether the UK ID and Passport Agency has done a survey like this? Would it help them to a) understand the breadth of public opinion, and b) start building a credible user-led case for ID solutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm. I actually didn&#8217;t find this intrusive at all. And I thought their questions were really pertinent and provocative, in getting me to think through how I really feel about the user requirement for a national ID card scheme. What sort of increased convenience and speed would make an ID card worthwhile, in return for handing over personal ID? </p>
<p>My answers reflected, I think, a deep mistrust I have over (certainly the UK) government&#8217;s ability to handle personal data accurately, securely and with integrity (and preferably to apologise when they get things wrong &#8211; unlike the recent CRB debacle&#8230;). I wonder whether the UK ID and Passport Agency has done a survey like this? Would it help them to a) understand the breadth of public opinion, and b) start building a credible user-led case for ID solutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
