<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s unofficial! Almost three in ten prefer Directgov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idealgovernment.com/2006/02/its_unofficial_almost_three_in_ten_prefer_directgov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2006/02/its_unofficial_almost_three_in_ten_prefer_directgov/</link>
	<description>What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: "A former official"</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2006/02/its_unofficial_almost_three_in_ten_prefer_directgov/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>"A former official"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://its_unofficial_almost_three_in_ten_prefer_directgov#comment-706</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure Ruth Kelly&#039;s answer only included costs to the CO. If I remember rightly, each dept was made to commit a certain level of additional funding for its &#039;franchises&#039; (Pinder got ministers to sign up to it) - so total cost is way more than £4.4m. Each department put in money &quot;per franchise&quot; (eg parents, job seekers, older people) and each franchise had to commit its own cash to the e-Envoys office. 

What we dont know is how much of that money ended up spent on e-envoy parties at the Century Club in Shaftesbury Ave (in which key OeE staff held shares I gather).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure Ruth Kelly&#8217;s answer only included costs to the CO. If I remember rightly, each dept was made to commit a certain level of additional funding for its &#8216;franchises&#8217; (Pinder got ministers to sign up to it) &#8211; so total cost is way more than £4.4m. Each department put in money &#8220;per franchise&#8221; (eg parents, job seekers, older people) and each franchise had to commit its own cash to the e-Envoys office. </p>
<p>What we dont know is how much of that money ended up spent on e-envoy parties at the Century Club in Shaftesbury Ave (in which key OeE staff held shares I gather).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Skelton</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2006/02/its_unofficial_almost_three_in_ten_prefer_directgov/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Skelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://its_unofficial_almost_three_in_ten_prefer_directgov#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s because Google trusts it&#039;s users to know what they are searching for?

Being the new owner of an open fire and vaguely aware of the Clean Air Act, I did a search for &#039;Smokeless Zone&#039;.

Every Goggle hit contained the words &#039;Smokeless Zone&#039;, and had some relationship with what could be burnt where. Most Direct.Gov links concerned giving up smoking - only one had anything to do with air pollution.

WIBBI the assumption was &#039;The user knows what they are doing&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because Google trusts it&#8217;s users to know what they are searching for?</p>
<p>Being the new owner of an open fire and vaguely aware of the Clean Air Act, I did a search for &#8216;Smokeless Zone&#8217;.</p>
<p>Every Goggle hit contained the words &#8216;Smokeless Zone&#8217;, and had some relationship with what could be burnt where. Most Direct.Gov links concerned giving up smoking &#8211; only one had anything to do with air pollution.</p>
<p>WIBBI the assumption was &#8216;The user knows what they are doing&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

