<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About that &#8220;unstoppable political momentum&#8221; for biometrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idealgovernment.com/2005/10/about_that_unstoppable_political_momentum_for_biometrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2005/10/about_that_unstoppable_political_momentum_for_biometrics/</link>
	<description>What do we want from Internet-age government? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2005/10/about_that_unstoppable_political_momentum_for_biometrics/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about_that_unstoppable_political_momentum_for_biometrics#comment-545</guid>
		<description>afftar mudag!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>afftar mudag!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Mills</title>
		<link>http://idealgovernment.com/2005/10/about_that_unstoppable_political_momentum_for_biometrics/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>T Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about_that_unstoppable_political_momentum_for_biometrics#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the EU just say that biometrics aren&#039;t sufficiently proven for large scale projects?

And I&#039;m sure that the ICAO rules require a digitized photo stored on a chip in the passport (presumably digitally signed). Surely this doesn&#039;t need the biometric centres and equipment the government claims. All it needs is some new equipment to make passports and some scanners to scan the picture.

Of course, it doesn&#039;t stop ministers misleading the house and the public over this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the EU just say that biometrics aren&#8217;t sufficiently proven for large scale projects?</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m sure that the ICAO rules require a digitized photo stored on a chip in the passport (presumably digitally signed). Surely this doesn&#8217;t need the biometric centres and equipment the government claims. All it needs is some new equipment to make passports and some scanners to scan the picture.</p>
<p>Of course, it doesn&#8217;t stop ministers misleading the house and the public over this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

